Gordon Fox • July 4, 2022
Training and Experience Count: Myectomy is Safest at High-Volume Centers
Myectomies at hospitals averaging more than 10 procedures per year led to fewer deaths and complications than at other hospitals.

Large study of US myectomies

Myectomy is safest at high-volume centers. A study accepted in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery provides new evidence of this.

Kimberly A. Holst and her collaborators (2022) examined nearly 6,000 US myectomies reported from 2012 to 2019. Their data came from a database compiled by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Mortality and post-operative risks lowest in high-volume centers

The researchers found that the chance of death was lowest in hospitals that performed more of the surgeries. But they also found that the risk of serious complications was much lower in these hospitals. The complications they studied included perforation of the interventricular septum and complete heart block.

Furthermore, those high-volume hospitals replaced mitral valves less often as part of the procedure.

Myectomy is safest in high-volume centers

These results strengthen the conclusions suggested by Kim et al. (2016) , that septal myectomy is safest at high-volume centers.

Literature cited

Holst, K. A., H. V. Schaff, N. G. Smedira, E. B. Habermann, C. N. Day, V. Badhwar, H. Takayama, P. M. McCarthy, and J. A. Dearani. 2022. Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcomes of Septal Myectomy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , in press.

Kim, L. K., R. V. Swaminathan, P. Looser, R. M. Minutello, S. C. Wong, G. Bergman, S. S. Naidu, C. L. F. Gade, K. Charitakis, H. S. Singh, and D. N. Feldman. 2016. Hospital volume outcomes after septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation for treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: US nationwide inpatient database, 2003-2011. J AMA Cardiology 1:324–332.

HCMA Blog

By Lisa Salberg October 10, 2025
The Price of Love: A Tribute to Esther
By Sabrina Cuddy August 1, 2025
On a background of pink
By Julie Russo July 31, 2025
Sixty years ago, Medicaid and Medicare were established when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Amendments into law. The programs were a larger part of Johnson's "War on Poverty" agenda to combat inequality. Sixty years later, Medicaid and Medicare are under attack in ways that we could never have imagined. With the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), $1 trillion was cut from Medicaid and Medicare―the largest health care cut in U.S. history. As a result of the budget package, more than 15 million people will lose health insurance, hundreds of rural hospitals will close, and approximately 51,000 people will die preventable deaths each year. Congress voted for this harm, and Congress can fix it. We need them to invest in Medicaid and Medicare in order to undo this damage. Click here to send a message to Congress telling them to invest in these critical programs, not cut them. OBBBA is the exact opposite of the "War on Poverty." The bill was passed with brutal cuts to health care to fund more tax handouts for the very wealthy. It took from the poor to give to the rich. The unpopularity of these cuts cannot be overstated. Eighty-three percent of the American public, including three in four Republicans, has a favorable view of Medicaid. Congress must hear from us loud and clear: reverse course, undo the harm to Medicaid and Medicare, and protect health care for more than 71 million people. Join us in sending the message to Congress to invest in these critical programs, don't cut them. 1 The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s Cuts to Medicaid and Medicare 2 Research Memo: Projected Mortality Impacts of the Budget Reconciliation Bill 3 Medicaid keeps getting more popular as Republicans aim to cut it by $800 billion
More Posts