Gordon Fox • December 7, 2023
Septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation: how safe and effective?

Background

A new meta-analysis ( Yokohama et al. 2023 ) on the comparative success and safety of the two methods of septal reduction therapy – alcohol septal ablation (ASA; https://4hcm.org/alcohol-septal-ablation/) and septal myectomy (SM; https://4hcm.org/myectomy/ ) – was just published in European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

Methods

Yujiro Yokoyama and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of studies that compared both techniques. They focused primarily on all-cause mortality with at least one year follow-up. Secondary outcomes they studied included permanent pacemaker implantations, 30-day mortality, cardiovascular mortality ≥1 year of follow-up, reduction in left ventricular pressure gradient, repeat operations for left ventricular obstruction, strokes, and rehospitalizations due to heart failure. The review included 27 studies, with over 6000 ASAs and over 9000 SMs.

Results: mortality

All-cause mortality was similar for the two methods at one-year. However, in the subset of studies that followed up patients for at least five years, the all-cause mortality was increased among ASA patients, with an increased risk of about 20%.

Results: efficacy and complications

ASA was associated with less reduction of the left ventricular pressure gradient (on average, about 11 mmHg less reduction). The chance of a patient needing a second ASA or SM was about 9 times greater for ASA than for SM. There were no significant differences between treatments in risk of stroke or hospitalization due to heart failure.

Last words

Septal myectomy is regarded as the “gold standard” for treating obstruction. ASA is recommended mainly for those who would be poor surgical candidates.

Literature cited

Y. Yokohama, et al. 2023. Alcohol septal ablation versus surgical septal myectomy of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis, _European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Volume 63, Issue 3, March 2023, ezad043, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad043

HCMA Blog

By Lisa Salberg October 10, 2025
The Price of Love: A Tribute to Esther
By Sabrina Cuddy August 1, 2025
On a background of pink
By Julie Russo July 31, 2025
Sixty years ago, Medicaid and Medicare were established when President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Social Security Amendments into law. The programs were a larger part of Johnson's "War on Poverty" agenda to combat inequality. Sixty years later, Medicaid and Medicare are under attack in ways that we could never have imagined. With the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), $1 trillion was cut from Medicaid and Medicare―the largest health care cut in U.S. history. As a result of the budget package, more than 15 million people will lose health insurance, hundreds of rural hospitals will close, and approximately 51,000 people will die preventable deaths each year. Congress voted for this harm, and Congress can fix it. We need them to invest in Medicaid and Medicare in order to undo this damage. Click here to send a message to Congress telling them to invest in these critical programs, not cut them. OBBBA is the exact opposite of the "War on Poverty." The bill was passed with brutal cuts to health care to fund more tax handouts for the very wealthy. It took from the poor to give to the rich. The unpopularity of these cuts cannot be overstated. Eighty-three percent of the American public, including three in four Republicans, has a favorable view of Medicaid. Congress must hear from us loud and clear: reverse course, undo the harm to Medicaid and Medicare, and protect health care for more than 71 million people. Join us in sending the message to Congress to invest in these critical programs, don't cut them. 1 The Truth About the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s Cuts to Medicaid and Medicare 2 Research Memo: Projected Mortality Impacts of the Budget Reconciliation Bill 3 Medicaid keeps getting more popular as Republicans aim to cut it by $800 billion
More Posts